She Never Got To See 40 — The Man Who Killed Her Is Getting OUT

Open metal handcuff hanging against a black background
Photo: Calypso Photo / Shutterstock

Christine Allen was stabbed to death in Fairfax County in 1998, when her daughter was three months old. Troy Demar got 40 years for it. On September 14, WJLA reported that Virginia’s newly appointed Parole Board has granted him parole after about 26 years, over her family’s objections, and that he is one of several violent offenders released since Governor Abigail Spanberger replaced the entire board in March. “My sister never got to see 40,” a family member said. “So why should he?”

Story Snapshot

  • September 14: WJLA’s Nick Minock reported the new board is granting about 10 percent of parole requests, roughly ten times the rate under Governor Youngkin’s board, which approved about 1 percent.
  • Grants include Demar (second-degree murder, 40-year sentence), a 41-year-old who served 24 years of a 63-year attempted-murder sentence, and a man who served 23 years of a 100-plus-year sentence for malicious wounding, rape, sodomy and firearm charges.
  • Governor Spanberger named a new five-member board on March 10, 2026, with Shannon Dion as chair; members serve at the governor’s pleasure.
  • The governor’s office had not responded to WJLA’s interview requests as of the report.

Where This Stands Right Now

The releases are happening now, and the family that fought Demar’s parole lost. The board’s written decision acknowledged “the strong opposition to Mr. Demar’s release on parole” and granted it anyway, citing an infraction-free record and rehabilitation: “You’ve actually done more programming than most inmates we see.” Former Attorney General Jason Miyares called the board’s approach “criminals first, victims last” and described the appointees as “social justice warriors.” No one in the governor’s office has explained the tenfold jump on the record.

What Changed In March

Governor Spanberger announced the new Parole Board on March 10, 2026, saying the goal was to restore the board’s intended function and protect public safety with fair decisions. State law sets the board at up to five gubernatorial appointees and gives them broad discretion to grant or deny parole case by case. The board posts monthly decision logs and meeting notices on its public site; the logs show grant and not-grant outcomes but not the reasoning behind each vote.

That structure is why one appointment announcement can change who walks out of prison. The same statutes, the same eligible inmates, and the same victim-notification rules were in place under the previous board. What changed was the people voting.

The Numbers And The Cases

WJLA compared the two boards’ approval rates and found roughly 1 percent under Youngkin’s appointees and roughly 10 percent under Spanberger’s. The named cases are what turned a statistic into a fight. Demar’s victim’s family told the station, “When Christine was murdered, her daughter was only three months old,” and, “He killed my sister. My life will never be the same.” The other grants involved sentences of 63 and more than 100 years, with less than a quarter of each served.

Supporters of the appointments point to the governor’s stated aim of fair decisions that still protect the public, and to the rehabilitation records the board cited. Critics answer that a sentence is a promise to a victim’s family, and that a board serving at a governor’s pleasure has quietly rewritten hundreds of those promises without the public seeing the risk assessments or release plans behind them.

Why It Matters Beyond Virginia

Parole boards are appointed, not elected, in most states, and their decisions rarely make news until a case like this one does. A change of governor can change the release rate by an order of magnitude with no new law and no vote. For families of victims, the lesson is that the sentence handed down in court is not the sentence that gets served. For voters, it is that the parole board is on the ballot every time the governor is.

What To Watch

Watch for whether the governor’s office answers the tenfold figure on the record, whether the board publishes fuller monthly data (offense types, time served, risk assessments), and whether Virginia lawmakers move to require plain-language explanations for parole grants in violent cases. The other marker is the next monthly decision log, which will show whether the rate holds.

Sources:

townhall.com, governor.virginia.gov, vpb.virginia.gov, virginiapoliticalnewsletter.substack.com, valawyersweekly.com, wvtf.org, wjla.com