Pennsylvania Judge’s Shocking Legal Turn: A Conviction Unveiled

Gavel handcuffs and text found guilty on blue

Pennsylvania Judge Sonya McKnight was convicted of attempted homicide and aggravated assault after shooting her ex-boyfriend in the head while he slept, culminating a history of judicial misconduct and personal violence.

Key Takeaways

Judge Sonya McKnight faces up to 60 years in prison after being found guilty of shooting her ex-boyfriend Michael McCoy in the head while he slept in February 2024.
McCoy testified that McKnight shot him after he asked her to move out of his home, with her final words being, “Oh, so you’re serious.”
This conviction follows a pattern of concerning behavior, including a previous shooting involving her estranged husband in 2019 and misconduct allegations that led to her suspension in 2023.
The judge had been suspended without pay since November 2023 due to violations of probation from a previous judicial misconduct case involving a traffic stop with her son.
Medical testimony revealed McCoy survived only due to the bullet’s specific trajectory, with doctors calling him “a walking miracle.”

A Judge’s Violent Response to Rejection

On February 10, 2024, Magisterial District Judge Sonya McKnight’s career and freedom came to an abrupt end when she shot her ex-boyfriend Michael McCoy in the head as he slept. The shooting occurred in McCoy’s home, where McKnight had been living despite his repeated requests for her to leave. After a brief two-hour deliberation, a jury from Delaware County found McKnight guilty of attempted homicide and aggravated assault, bringing a shocking end to her judicial career that began when she was elected to the Dauphin County bench in 2016.

During the two-day trial, prosecutors presented evidence portraying McKnight as a jealous partner who resorted to violence when faced with rejection. The most damning testimony came from McCoy himself, who recounted asking McKnight to move out. According to his testimony, her final words before shooting him were “Oh, so you’re serious,” indicating her inability to accept the end of their relationship. Though McKnight’s defense attempted to create reasonable doubt by claiming McCoy couldn’t identify the shooter, the fact that she was the only other person present in the home severely undermined this argument.

Pennsylvania judge convicted of shooting ex-boyfriend in head as he slept https://t.co/CQXd5O50Iq

— Fox News (@FoxNews) April 10, 2025

A History of Violence and Misconduct

The February shooting was not McKnight’s first encounter with violence. Court records revealed a troubling history including a 2019 incident where she shot her estranged husband. Though that shooting was ultimately deemed self-defense with no charges filed, it established a pattern of gun violence in her personal relationships. By the time of the 2024 shooting, McKnight had already been suspended without pay since November 2023 due to allegations of judicial misconduct, making this case all the more concerning for those who expect judges to maintain high ethical standards.

“This was a hard-fought trial that ultimately came down to the credibility of the victim. He is a walking miracle.” – Seán McCormack, Cumberland County District Attorney

The Judicial Conduct Board had previously alleged that McKnight violated probation from an earlier misconduct case. That case stemmed from a 2020 traffic stop involving her son, where she allegedly abused her position of authority. These repeated violations of professional ethics and personal conduct demonstrate a concerning pattern for someone entrusted with upholding the law. The Cumberland County District Attorney, Seán McCormack, expressed satisfaction with the verdict, emphasizing the severity and personal nature of the crime.

Miraculous Survival and Legal Consequences

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of this case is McCoy’s survival after being shot in the head at close range. Dr. Steven Allen, who treated McCoy after the shooting, testified that the bullet’s specific trajectory was critical to his survival. McCoy himself described the immediate aftermath, saying, “I thought I was having a brain aneurysm,” as he couldn’t see and had no idea what had happened. His testimony proved crucial in establishing the facts of the case, despite defense attempts to question his ability to identify his attacker.

“Oh, so you’re serious” – Michael McCoy

McKnight now faces up to 60 years in prison, with sentencing scheduled for May 28. The case serves as a stark reminder that no one is above the law, regardless of their position in the legal system. The conviction effectively ends her judicial career and transforms her from a judge to a convicted felon. For those in positions of public trust, particularly in the justice system, this case underscores the importance of maintaining ethical standards both in professional duties and personal conduct.