Diverging Views: Alaskan Support for Trump vs. Criticism of Biden on Energy

Snow-covered mountain under blue sky with green foreground.

Alaskan Indigenous communities are deeply divided over Trump’s revival of oil and gas development policies that Biden had previously restricted, with economic necessity and environmental preservation at the center of this complex debate.

Key Takeaways

The Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat, representing several North Slope communities, supports renewed drilling opportunities under Trump policies after receiving significant state funding.
Native leaders criticize the Biden administration for failing to adequately consult with indigenous communities on policy decisions affecting their regions.
North Slope communities rely heavily on oil and gas revenue, with 95% of the region’s budget coming from related infrastructure taxes.
Opposing indigenous groups like Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic advocate for environmental protection and alternative economic models.
The debate highlights tensions between economic development needs and cultural/environmental preservation in Native communities.

Indigenous Support for Trump’s Energy Policies

Native Alaskan tribes, particularly the Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat (VAI), are celebrating the revival of oil and gas leasing in Alaska’s North Slope region. The Department of the Interior’s decision reopens drilling in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska and the Arctic Wildlife National Refuge’s Coastal Plain, areas previously restricted under Biden administration policies. This move aligns with Trump’s vision of “American Energy Dominance” and has garnered support from communities heavily dependent on oil revenue.

The Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat, which received a five-year reimbursable state grant worth at least $1 million from Alaska’s Republican governor Mike Dunleavy, represents 21 member organizations including Alaska Native corporations and communities. These communities derive substantial economic benefits from oil development, with the North Slope’s economy relying on fossil fuel infrastructure for 95% of its budget. Native leaders see the new direction as potentially beneficial for their economic self-determination.

Criticism of Biden Administration Engagement

Indigenous leaders supporting energy development have expressed frustration with what they describe as inadequate consultation by the Biden administration. According to VAI representatives, the previous administration’s approach prioritized politics over meaningful engagement with North Slope communities. This sentiment is reflected in statements from community leaders who felt their voices were ignored when Biden implemented restrictions on drilling in their traditional territories.

“DOI’s announcement is a positive step toward stronger engagement with North Slope Iñupiat communities—and a welcome change from the last administration’s approach that put politics over our people, our self-determination, and its legal obligation to consult with governments on the North Slope” – Doreen Leavitt

Republican Alaska Representative Nick Begich has echoed these criticisms, claiming North Slope Iñupiat communities were denied a seat at the table under Biden. The congressman has been a vocal supporter of reopening Alaska’s lands to energy development, arguing that such policies benefit both energy prices and national security while respecting local indigenous perspectives on resource management.

Divided Indigenous Perspectives

While VAI claims to represent a “majority consensus” among Iñupiaq organizations, this assertion is contested by other indigenous groups. Organizations such as Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic and Native Movement strongly oppose new drilling operations, advocating instead for a transition to a more environmentally sustainable and equitable economy that doesn’t depend on fossil fuels. These groups emphasize the ecological damage that oil development can cause to the Arctic’s fragile ecosystem.

“We can make a living without cannibalizing our lands” – Enei Begaye

Even among drilling supporters, the enthusiasm comes with reservations. Nagruk Harcharek, president of VAI, described his organization’s position as “cautious optimism,” acknowledging the delicate balance between economic development and preserving the cultural practices that depend on healthy ecosystems. This nuanced perspective highlights the complex considerations indigenous leaders must navigate when evaluating energy policy.

State Support and Political Influence

Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy has maintained a notably close relationship with VAI, attending their meetings and collaborating on opinion pieces promoting Arctic drilling. Records show the governor’s office and VAI have strategized to counter arguments from indigenous groups opposed to drilling. Critics argue this relationship raises questions about the influence of state funding on indigenous advocacy positions and whether dissenters within Arctic communities are being adequately heard.

“The governor has an unusually close relationship with [the] Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat” – Chris Marshall

As the presidential election approaches, indigenous perspectives will continue to play a significant role in the ongoing debate over Arctic drilling. Both economic necessity and environmental concerns represent legitimate priorities for Native communities, reflecting the complex realities of life in Alaska’s North Slope region where traditional practices, modern economic needs, and climate change impacts intersect.