The Justice Department says agents seized over $560,000 in cryptocurrency that was being routed to Hamas’s military wing, and then took over parts of the group’s online fundraising system.
Story Highlights
- Justice Department reports seizures topping $560,000 tied to Hamas fundraising.
- Agents say they used human sources and warrants across 2025 to trace funds.
- Officials also seized domains and servers used to solicit and move money.
- Earlier filings tied related wallets to more than $1.5 million laundered since 2024.
What Officials Say They Seized And Why It Matters
The Justice Department said it seized over $560,000 in cryptocurrency that was intended to support Hamas’s Al Qassam Brigades, which the United States designates as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. Officials said the effort was not a single wallet grab, but part of a wider move to disrupt how the group raises and moves money online. The department also reported taking control of domains and servers used to recruit supporters and collect funds, which can help block future flows.
The FBI seized over $560,000 from Hamas' crypto fundraising operation in 2025, then used the captured systems to collect additional donations, according to the DOJ.
— Laura Parker (@LauraParke15968) September 4, 2026
Officials described an operation that unfolded through a series of court-approved seizures in 2025. According to the department, agents relied on multiple human sources to identify and trace the funds. Three cryptocurrency seizure warrants were executed on March 25, June 25, and October 10, 2025. These steps, the department said, helped agents follow money paths and seize assets linked to Hamas’s military wing. A related press account noted the department released five affidavits alongside the action.
How The Case Fits A Larger Pattern
The department linked the 2026 seizures to earlier actions that outlined a broader network. In March 2025, officials said seized funds had been traced to fundraising addresses that laundered more than $1.5 million in virtual currency since October 2024. In a separate filing, the government unsealed a civil action targeting about $2 million tied to a company called BuyCash, which it said helped financially support Hamas operations. These steps suggest a steady push to identify crypto-based methods that terror groups attempt to use.
Past enforcement shows this is not new. In 2020, the department announced what it called the largest terrorism-linked crypto seizure at the time, naming Hamas’s military wing among the targets. That history matters for today’s case because it shows how law enforcement mixes intelligence, court warrants, and server or domain takedowns to disrupt online finance. The latest action repeats that pattern by pairing wallet seizures with infrastructure control to restrict fundraising channels.
What Was Taken Down Beyond The Money
The department said it seized domains and servers that Hamas used to gather donations and recruit support. Taking over those systems can let agents stop new inflows, gather evidence, and sometimes warn would-be donors that their money will not reach the group. This line of work often includes court orders that require service providers to hand over server data or transfer control. The department positioned these moves as steps to break an ongoing fundraising scheme, not just freeze past assets.
The FBI seized over $560,000 from Hamas' crypto fundraising operation in 2025, then used the captured systems to collect additional donations, according to the DOJ.
— Laura Parker (@LauraParke15968) September 4, 2026
CoinDesk, citing the department’s release, reported that five affidavits were made public tied to the operations, including three crypto seizure warrants and two infrastructure warrants. Public summaries do not include every technical detail about tracing methods. But the department’s filings and statements frame the seizures as part of a consistent counterterrorism finance approach that runs across multiple years and cases.
What This Means For Donors, Platforms, And Policy
For would-be donors, the message is simple: crypto is not a shield from law enforcement. Blockchain analysis and human sources can expose flows, and court orders can seize funds in custody accounts or when they touch compliant platforms. For exchanges and hosting firms, the case shows ongoing pressure to monitor, freeze, and report suspicious activity. For policymakers, the numbers here are modest next to the size of global finance, but the strategy aims to raise the cost and risk for terror support.
For the public, the takeaway cuts across politics. People on the right want forceful action against terrorism and better border and financial controls. People on the left worry about extremist violence and dark-money pipelines. Both camps doubt that Washington manages money well or holds powerful actors to account. This case shows the government can track and seize illegal funds online. The real test is scale and follow-through: cutting off more routes, faster, while guarding civil liberties in the process.
Sources:
thegatewaypundit.com, justice.gov, coindesk.com, youtube.com
