Vice President Kamala Harris declines to reveal her stance on California’s controversial Proposition 36, leaving voters guessing about her position on the hotly debated crime measure.
At a Glance
- Proposition 36 aims to increase penalties for retail and drug crimes in California
- Harris refuses to disclose her vote, citing the proximity to the election
- Governor Gavin Newsom opposes the measure, while 73% of polled Californians support it
- The proposition is backed by law enforcement associations and some Democratic leaders
- Critics argue it could disproportionately affect poor individuals and substance users
Harris Sidesteps Proposition 36 Question
As California grapples with rising crime rates, Vice President Kamala Harris has chosen to remain silent on her stance regarding Proposition 36, a contentious ballot measure aimed at increasing penalties for retail and drug offenses. When pressed by reporters about her vote on the proposition, Harris deflected, stating she would not discuss the matter so close to the election.
“So my ballot is on its way to California and I’m going to trust the system that it will arrive there. I’m not going to talk about the vote on that because, honestly, it’s the Sunday before the election. I don’t intend to create an endorsement one way or another around it, but I did vote.” – Kamala Harris
Harris’s reluctance to take a public stance on Proposition 36 reflects the politically sensitive nature of crime legislation, especially as she navigates her role as Vice President and potential future presidential candidate. This cautious approach, however, may draw criticism from both sides of the political spectrum.
Outrageous dodge.
Prop 36 directly repeals soft-on-crime policies Kamala Harris put in place as the Attorney General of California – which led to the current crime/homelessness crisis.
Refusing to take a position on this bipartisan 70% popular change is pathetic. https://t.co/EYg998bNTY
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) November 3, 2024
Proposition 36: A Divisive Measure
Proposition 36 would make significant changes to California’s criminal justice system, including making shoplifting a felony for repeat offenders and increasing penalties for certain drug charges, including those involving fentanyl. Supporters argue that these changes are necessary to address rising crime rates and close legal loopholes affecting law enforcement.
The measure has gained support from various law enforcement organizations, including the California District Attorneys Association and the California State Sheriffs’ Association. Additionally, it has received backing from both the Republican Party of California and prominent Democrats like San Francisco Mayor London Breed.
Opposition and Concerns
Despite its strong support among law enforcement and some political leaders, Proposition 36 faces opposition from notable figures, including Governor Gavin Newsom. The governor has criticized the measure, arguing that it would divert funds from effective safety initiatives.
“millions from what’s proven to actually keep us safe.” – Gavin Newsom
Critics of Proposition 36 warn that it could lead to harsh sentencing for low-level crimes and disproportionately affect poor individuals and those struggling with substance use issues. The Los Angeles Times has come out against the measure, cautioning that it could endorse current police tactics without addressing underlying social issues.
“In total, Proposition 36 would increase local criminal justice costs, likely by tens of millions of dollars annually” – the adviser board
Public Opinion and Electoral Implications
Despite the opposition from some high-profile Democrats, public support for Proposition 36 appears strong. A recent Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) poll indicated that 73% of respondents plan to vote in favor of the measure, reflecting widespread concern over crime in the state.
The debate surrounding Proposition 36 comes amid a contentious election cycle in California, where crime and criminal justice reform are key issues. Several local officials, including San Francisco Mayor London Breed and Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón, face challenges related to their handling of crime and homelessness.
As Californians prepare to cast their votes, the silence from Vice President Harris on this crucial issue leaves many wondering about her stance on criminal justice reform and its potential impact on her political future. With crime data showing increases in shoplifting and other offenses in major California cities, the outcome of Proposition 36 could have far-reaching consequences for the state’s approach to law enforcement and criminal justice.
Sources:
- Harris Refuses To Say Whether She Voted On Tough-On-Crime California Ballot Measure
- Harris won’t say how she voted on California measure that would reverse criminal justice reforms
- Harris avoids weighing in on California’s tough-on-crime measure Prop 36
